What was issue 2 in ohio

The language is too vague and may unintentionally preclude future policy or tax issues from being brought forward as an initiative. Issue 2 gives the Ballot Board too much discretion to declare a proposed initiative to be a monopoly and force it to jump through two hurdles instead of one. Getting initiatives on the ballot in Ohio is difficult and expensive. Citizens should have a reasonable opportunity to put forth a viable ballot initiative.

Editor's note: Filed campaign finance reports do not clearly indicate to which funds are spent in support of Issue 3 or against Issue 2. As such, the following finance details are for the PAC as a whole. A March filing with the U. The Cleveland. The Beacon Journal editorial board said: [24]. The Toledo Blade argued: [25]. Despite these drawbacks, the core reasoning behind Issue 2 is sound: The state constitution should be a statement of basic rights and principles, not a tool for rich individuals and special interests to give themselves privileges that are unavailable to other Ohioans.

Vote YES on Issue 2. The Cincinnati Enquirer editorial board argued: [26]. Ohio citizens deserve access to direct democracy, and any restriction on the initiative process should be very carefully tailored. Issue 2 doesn't meet the test. The University of Akron Buckeye Poll below conducted between September and October found that 38 percent of registered voters supported the amendment, while 28 percent opposed and 34 percent were undecided.

Commissioned by Ohio television news station WKYC, Kent State University surveyed registered voters in Ohio to determine how they would vote on ballot measures in the upcoming election. After providing respondents with summaries of the ballot wording for each measure from the Ohio Secretary of State website, researchers asked how they plan to vote. The survey found that 54 percent of voters would have supported Issue 2 and 26 percent were undecided.

A Bowling Green State University poll found that According to Article XVI of the Ohio Constitution , a 60 percent vote in both chambers of the legislature is required in order to place a legislatively referred constitutional amendment on a ballot. The measure was introduced into the Ohio Legislature by Rep. Ryan Smith R and Rep. Michael F. Curtin D as House Joint Resolution 4. The Ohio Senate voted 20 to 9 in favor of the measure on June 30, The vote was split down party lines, with Republicans voting for the measure and Democrats against.

The Ohio House of Representatives took up the measure on the same day and referred the amendment to the ballot with a to vote. Ballotpedia identified counties that voted for Donald Trump R in after voting for Barack Obama D in and Collectively, Trump won these Pivot Counties by more than , votes. Of these counties, nine are located in Ohio, accounting for 4. In , Ballotpedia re-examined the Pivot Counties to view their voting patterns following that year's presidential election. What's on my ballot?

Elections in How to vote How to run for office Ballot measures. Who represents me? President U. Ballotpedia features , encyclopedic articles written and curated by our professional staff of editors, writers, and researchers. Click here to contact our editorial staff, and click here to report an error. Click here to contact us for media inquiries, and please donate here to support our continued expansion. Share this page Follow Ballotpedia.

What's on your ballot? Jump to: navigation , search. Speaker Cliff Rosenberger R Rep. Tim W. Brown R-3 Rep. Jim Buchy R Rep. Timothy Derickson R Rep. Doug Green R Rep. Robert McColley R Rep. Ron Amstutz R-1 Rep. Marlene Anielski R-6 Rep.

Louis W. Terry Boose R Rep. Tony Burkley R Rep. Jim Butler R Rep. Margaret Conditt R Rep. Jonathan Dever R Rep. The poll also showed support for a provision in SB 5 that would establish a merit-based pay system. Keith Faber, the number-two ranking Senate Republican, said the defeat of Issue 2 does not mean voters are happy with the current collective bargaining law that passed in He said the Issue 2 campaign made it clear to him the law needs to be revised.

Faber, who argued in favor of Issue 2 at a half dozen debates before the election, said lawmakers should not hesitate to pursue collective bargaining reform again, despite the intense opposition from labor groups and Democrats. Democratic Sen. Joe Schiavoni, the highest-ranking Democrat on the Senate committee that heard SB5, said he expects Republicans to reintroduce the parts of the bill that polled well.

Plain Dealer reporter Joe Guillen contributed to this story. Note to readers: if you purchase something through one of our affiliate links we may earn a commission. All rights reserved About Us. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of Advance Local. Community Rules apply to all content you upload or otherwise submit to this site.

Ad Choices. Don't settle for anything less than responsible journalism. After three Cincinnati City Council members were arrested on federal bribery charges this past year, their colleagues are offering voters the chance to change how corruption is handled at City Hall. Issue 1 and Issue 2 both pertain to responding to council members who have been indicted for crimes. Issue 1, introduced by Smitherman, would require the city to appoint a special prosecutor in cases where there is statewide action to remove a council member from office.

This would prevent a conflict of interest where the city solicitor would essentially have to prosecute his or her boss. Issue 1 would also prevent a council member — once indicted for a felony or a criminal charge related to official conduct — from changing his or her successor designation certificate.

Essentially, each council member currently chooses a colleague or colleagues to select a replacement should the council member be unable to complete his or her term.

Of these counties, nine are located in Ohio, accounting for 4. In , Ballotpedia re-examined the Pivot Counties to view their voting patterns following that year's presidential election.

An initiative similar to California Proposition 61 and Ohio Issue 2 was filed in South Dakota targeting the ballot. Another similar initiative targeting the November ballot was filed in Washington, D. The link below is to the most recent stories in a Google news search for the terms Ohio Issue 2 Drug Price Initiative These results are automatically generated from Google.

Ballotpedia does not curate or endorse these articles. What's on my ballot? Elections in How to vote How to run for office Ballot measures.

Who represents me? President U. Ballotpedia features , encyclopedic articles written and curated by our professional staff of editors, writers, and researchers. Click here to contact our editorial staff, and click here to report an error. Click here to contact us for media inquiries, and please donate here to support our continued expansion. Share this page Follow Ballotpedia. What's on your ballot? Jump to: navigation , search. Chapter Drug Price Relief Section B Findings and Declarations.

The People of the State of Ohio hereby find and declare all of the following: 1 Prescription drug costs have been, and continue to be, one of the greatest drivers of rising health care costs in Ohio.

C Purposes and Intent. The People of the State of Ohio hereby declare the following purposes and intent in enacting this Act: 1 To enable the State of Ohio to pay the same prices for prescription drugs as the prices paid by the United States Department of Veterans Affairs, thus rectifying the imbalance among government payers.

D Drug Pricing. E Liberal Construction. This Act shall be liberally construed to effectuate its purpose. F Severability. G Legal Defense. Bernie Sanders I-Vermont [19] Sen. Cecil Thomas D-9 [20] Rep. Bill Patmon D [20] Rep. Sets forth factors in determining "net cost. Provide that the Act shall liberally construed to effectuate its purpose. Provide that if any provision of the Act is held to be invalid, the remaining provisions shall remain in effect.

Provide that if the Act is challenged in court, it shall be defended by the Attorney General. Declare that the committee of individuals responsible for circulation of the petition "the proponents" have a direct and personal stake in defending the Act and any one or more of them may do so in court if challenged. Provide that the proponents shall be indemnified by the state for their reasonable attorney's fees and expenses in defending against a legal challenge to the Act. Provide that in the event that the Act and another law are adopted by the voters at the same election and contain conflicting provisions and the Act received less votes, the non-conflicting provisions of the Act shall take effect.

Require the General Assembly to enact any additional laws and the Governor to take any additional actions required to promptly implement the Act. File:USA Ohio location map. Pricing Standards. Initiative Statute. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source. Presidential Elections. Categories : Ohio ballot measures State ballots, State Ballot Measure, November 7, Defeated, Defeated, November 7, Healthcare, Ohio Healthcare, Certified, healthcare, Ohio ballot measures, certified Initiated statute certified for the ballot Ballot measure article with polls Ballot measure article with polls, Current measure lawsuit Ballot measure with lawsuit, Ballot measure with lawsuit, Ohio, Ballot measure lawsuit about Signature validity Ballot measure lawsuit about Circulators Ballot measure with lawsuit, Ohio Pages with broken file links.

Hidden category: Pages with reference errors. Voter information What's on my ballot? Where do I vote? How do I register to vote?

How do I request a ballot? When do I vote? When are polls open? Who Represents Me? Congress special elections Governors State executives State legislatures Ballot measures State judges Municipal officials School boards. How do I update a page? Election results.

Privacy policy About Ballotpedia Disclaimers Login. Election date November 7, Topic Healthcare. Status d Defeated. Type State statute. Origin Citizens.

November 7, Ohio Issue 1. A "yes" vote supported this measure to require state agencies and programs to purchase prescription drugs at prices no higher than what the U.

Department of Veterans Affairs VA pays for them. A "no" vote opposed this measure to require state agencies and programs to purchase prescription drugs at prices no higher than what the VA pays for them. To enact Chapter of the Ohio Revised Code, which would: Require the State of Ohio, including its state departments, agencies and entities, to not pay more for prescription drugs than the price paid by the United States Department of Veterans Affairs.